> If the problem only impacts User-mode Linux, it's hard for me to justify
> hanging the "critical" label on it. However I'm willing to look at the
> patch, bless it, and send it on to Linus (who as you know sometimes is a
> softy about such things. :-)
>
> I'm pretty sure that we'd be able to get it into 2.4.x, x > 0 at the
> very least, since the patch is highly localized, won't break anything,
> and is easy to test for correctness.
Is it easier to fix the 3K stack use there or to prove no irq/bh path
combination uses 5K ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
