Also sprach Abramo Bagnara:
} 
} Isn't this more efficient?
}   n = (x>>32) | (x<<32); 
}   n = ((n & 0x0000ffff0000ffffLL)<<16) | (n & 0xffff0000ffff0000LL)>>16; 
}   n = ((n & 0x00ff00ff00ff00ffLL)<<8) | (n & 0xff00ff00ff00ff00LL)>>8; 
} 
} 6 shift
} 4 and
} 3 or
} 
Plus 3 assigns...but they may get optimized out. :)

} instead of
} 
} 8 shift
} 8 and
} 7 or
} 

-- 
|| Bill Wendling                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to