"David S. Miller" wrote: > > Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:23:26 -0600 > From: Matt Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Have you thought about an SOL_SOCKET level socket option? It might > be more intuitive for programmers than an ioctl and could be > documented with sockets where it will be used. > > Where did I say "ioctl"? Sorry, I've had ioctl on the brain lately. Yes, sysctl is a good solution. -- Matthew Peterson Sr. Software Engineer Caldera Systems, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alberto Bertogli
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Jamie Lokier
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Horst von Brand
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Jamie Lokier
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses H. Peter Anvin
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local address... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Felix von Leitner
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Andi Kleen