"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:07:57 -0600 > From: Matt Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hence, the JVM fails compatibility on Linux 2.4. > > Due ot this and other reasons I'm restoring the 2.2.x behavior by > default, but adding a sysctl so that systems using dynamic addressing > may elect to get the different bind() behavior. Thanks! Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Woodhouse
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Eric Lammerts
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alexander Viro
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alan Cox
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Christoph Rohland
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz