On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:53:08AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Look like a structure mis-match to me, although lv_v2_t is the same for > all tools. Sorry I was wrong. The __unused field is missing. Yet another reason for an official 0.8 maintaince release ;) Christoph -- Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Rik van Riel
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Rik van Riel
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Heinz J. Mauelshagen
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken... Rik van Riel
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Heinz J. Mauelshagen
- Re: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Christoph Hellwig
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Christoph Hellwig
- Re: LVM snapshotting broken? Andreas Dilger