On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:41:18PM +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote: [...] > > would leave a comment that is correct, but less useful (I'd expect any > > kernel hacker to know that u64 is non-atomic on many platforms). > > > If kernel hackers are expected to already know it's non-atomic we could > remove the whole comment. > > The comment regarding "volatile" was bogus since "volatile" wouldn't > help against getting garbage when reading an u64 variable.
Well, it's probably too trivial to argue about anyways - I don't mind much in either direction. Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
