On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:57 AM, kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on ipsec/master -- if it's inappropriate base, 
> please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>
> url:    
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dan-Streetman/xfrm-dst_entries_init-per-net-dst_ops/20151029-193245
> config: x86_64-randconfig-x019-201543 (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=x86_64
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c: In function 'xfrm_policy_register_afinfo':
>>> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2810:14: warning: unused variable 'net' 
>>> [-Wunused-variable]
>      struct net *net;
>                  ^

well, i should have caught that one.  resending patch.

thnx!

>
> vim +/net +2810 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
>
> ebb762f27 Steffen Klassert 2011-11-23  2794  static unsigned int 
> xfrm_mtu(const struct dst_entry *dst)
> d33e45533 David S. Miller  2010-12-14  2795  {
> 618f9bc74 Steffen Klassert 2011-11-23  2796     unsigned int mtu = 
> dst_metric_raw(dst, RTAX_MTU);
> 618f9bc74 Steffen Klassert 2011-11-23  2797
> 618f9bc74 Steffen Klassert 2011-11-23  2798     return mtu ? : 
> dst_mtu(dst->path);
> d33e45533 David S. Miller  2010-12-14  2799  }
> d33e45533 David S. Miller  2010-12-14  2800
> f894cbf84 David S. Miller  2012-07-02  2801  static struct neighbour 
> *xfrm_neigh_lookup(const struct dst_entry *dst,
> f894cbf84 David S. Miller  2012-07-02  2802                                   
>      struct sk_buff *skb,
> f894cbf84 David S. Miller  2012-07-02  2803                                   
>      const void *daddr)
> d3aaeb38c David S. Miller  2011-07-18  2804  {
> f894cbf84 David S. Miller  2012-07-02  2805     return 
> dst->path->ops->neigh_lookup(dst, skb, daddr);
> d3aaeb38c David S. Miller  2011-07-18  2806  }
> d3aaeb38c David S. Miller  2011-07-18  2807
> ^1da177e4 Linus Torvalds   2005-04-16  2808  int 
> xfrm_policy_register_afinfo(struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo)
> ^1da177e4 Linus Torvalds   2005-04-16  2809  {
> d7c7544c3 Alexey Dobriyan  2010-01-24 @2810     struct net *net;
> ^1da177e4 Linus Torvalds   2005-04-16  2811     int err = 0;
> ^1da177e4 Linus Torvalds   2005-04-16  2812     if (unlikely(afinfo == NULL))
> ^1da177e4 Linus Torvalds   2005-04-16  2813             return -EINVAL;
> ^1da177e4 Linus Torvalds   2005-04-16  2814     if (unlikely(afinfo->family 
> >= NPROTO))
> ^1da177e4 Linus Torvalds   2005-04-16  2815             return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
> ef8531b64 Eric Dumazet     2012-08-19  2816     
> spin_lock(&xfrm_policy_afinfo_lock);
> ^1da177e4 Linus Torvalds   2005-04-16  2817     if 
> (unlikely(xfrm_policy_afinfo[afinfo->family] != NULL))
> f31e8d4f7 Li RongQing      2015-04-23  2818             err = -EEXIST;
>
> :::::: The code at line 2810 was first introduced by commit
> :::::: d7c7544c3d5f59033d1bf3236bc7b289f5f26b75 netns xfrm: deal with dst 
> entries in netns
>
> :::::: TO: Alexey Dobriyan <adobri...@gmail.com>
> :::::: CC: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to