Hi Jiri,

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:09:46PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:15:38AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> >  
> >             if (!rem_sq_bracket)
> >                     return ret;
> >  
> > +           if (callchain_param.value == CCVAL_COUNT) {
> > +                   rem_node.count = child->parent->children_count - 
> > cumul_count;
> > +                   if (rem_node.count <= 0)
> > +                           return ret;
> > +           }
> > +
> >             new_depth_mask &= ~(1 << (depth - 1));
> > -           ret += ipchain__fprintf_graph(fp, NULL, &rem_hits, depth,
> > +           ret += ipchain__fprintf_graph(fp, &rem_node, &rem_hits, depth,
> >                                           new_depth_mask, 0, total_samples,
> >                                           left_margin);
> 
> this looks like being introduced within your patchset in patch:
>   perf callchain: Abstract callchain print function
> 
> shouldn't it get fixed in there?

Right. I'll move it to the commit

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to