On Monday 02 November 2015 13:56:31 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> static inline void rk_timer_disable(struct clock_event_device *ce)
> {
> writel_relaxed(TIMER_DISABLE, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
> - dsb();
> + dsb(sy);
> }
>
> static inline void rk_timer_enable(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 flags)
> {
> writel_relaxed(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_INT_UNMASK | flags,
> rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
> - dsb();
> + dsb(sy);
> }
>
>
This will fail the compile test, because dsb() is not available on non-ARM
architectures. Would it be enough to just use the normal writel() accessor
here?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
