On 11/02/2015 01:32 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> And the major factor here is number 2.
> 
> In your dmesg:
> [   67.891156] rbtree testing -> 570841 cycles
> [   88.609636] augmented rbtree testing
> [  116.546697] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s!
> [swapper/0:1]
> 
> 
> I've tried to reproduce this, and got this:
> [    0.693574] rbtree testing -> 15513 cycles
> 570841/15513 = 36x times faster.
> 
> [    1.159450] augmented rbtree testing -> 23675 cycles
> [    1.864996]
> It took less than a second, meanwhile in your case it didn't finish in
> 22 seconds.
> 
> This makes me think that your host is overloaded and the problem is on
> your side.

It's probably just a matter of putting some cond_resched()s in the test
code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to