On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:42:26 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 November 2015 17:27:21 Michael Büsch wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:05:51 +0100 > > Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > > > > > The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other > > > ones, which means we can build the framwork without any > > > front-end, but that results in a warning: > > > > > > drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not > > > used [-Wunused-function] > > > > > > This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to > > > shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on > > > any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build > > > without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first > > > place. > > > > > > Is there a simple way to disallow this configuration? > > I could not come up with a simple one. We could turn 'CONFIG_SSB' into > a silent option and have it selected by each bus specific driver, > but then we also have to change all the device drivers (usb and > wireless I guess) to use 'depends on' rather than 'select'. The other way around? The drivers already select SSB. However I think we should have SSB selectable by user for the embedded case. But well, I can live with this patch then. Kalle, you might apply it with Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m...@bues.ch> -- Michael
pgpWRfzW7n6KR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
