From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:30:29 +0100

The vfree() function performs also input parameter validation.
Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c
index 2d3848c..bb8b530 100644
--- a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c
@@ -143,9 +143,7 @@ static int fjes_hw_alloc_epbuf(struct epbuf_handler *epbh)
 
 static void fjes_hw_free_epbuf(struct epbuf_handler *epbh)
 {
-       if (epbh->buffer)
-               vfree(epbh->buffer);
-
+       vfree(epbh->buffer);
        epbh->buffer = NULL;
        epbh->size = 0;
 
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to