On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
[...] > Hi Kevin and Kernel CI folks, > > Could lkdtm get added to the kernel-CI workflows? Extracting and > validating Oops details when poking lkdtm would be extremely valuable > for these cases. :) Yeah, we can add that. What arches should we expect this to be working on? For starters we'll get builds going with CONFIG_LKDTM=y, and then start looking at adding the tests on arches that should work. Thes will be an interesting failure modes to catch because a kernel panic is actually a PASS, and a failure to panic is a FAIL. :) Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
