On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 09.11.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Herrmann: > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:56:04AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > >> > >>> The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel > >>> way'. > >> > >> This is not true; the last complete posting I could find was: > >> > >> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:09:06 +0100 > >> Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add kdbus implementation > > > > ..which was the last time we proposed it for inclusion. > > Guys, let's cool down. :-) > > What Peter is complaining about is that since the last proposal a lot > of iterative patches and even pull requests were sent instead of > complete patch series. > The expectation was that you send patch series with fixes folded in > as long the review takes.
And that will happen, when the code is ready, nothing different is happening here from any other code submission. I don't know why people somehow think we don't know how to do this whole thing, it's as if they don't trust us, which is sad. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
