On Mon, Nov 09 2015, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> cma allocation should be guranteeded to succeed, but, sometimes,
> it could be failed in current implementation. To track down
> the problem, we need to know which page is problematic and
> this new tracepoint will report it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>

I’m not really familiar with tracing framework but other then that:

Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <min...@mina86.com>

> ---
>  include/trace/events/cma.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/page_isolation.c        |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

-- 
Best regards,                                            _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of         o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  ミハウ “mina86” ナザレヴイツ  (o o)
ooo +--<m...@google.com>--<xmpp:min...@jabber.org>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to