The function uniphier_cache_get_next_level_node() does the same thing
as of_find_next_cache_node().  Drop the former and stick to the common
API.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
---

 arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c | 13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c
index 0502ba1..a6fa7b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-uniphier.c
@@ -377,17 +377,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id uniphier_cache_match[] 
__initconst = {
        { /* sentinel */ }
 };
 
-static struct device_node * __init uniphier_cache_get_next_level_node(
-                                                       struct device_node *np)
-{
-       u32 phandle;
-
-       if (of_property_read_u32(np, "next-level-cache", &phandle))
-               return NULL;
-
-       return of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
-}
-
 static int __init __uniphier_cache_init(struct device_node *np,
                                        unsigned int *cache_level)
 {
@@ -491,7 +480,7 @@ static int __init __uniphier_cache_init(struct device_node 
*np,
         * next level cache fails because we want to continue with available
         * cache levels.
         */
-       next_np = uniphier_cache_get_next_level_node(np);
+       next_np = of_find_next_cache_node(np);
        if (next_np) {
                (*cache_level)++;
                ret = __uniphier_cache_init(next_np, cache_level);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to