On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:56:12AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
> index 42169283448b..fa1262b025e7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
> @@ -1129,6 +1129,9 @@ static __init int pt_init(void)
> {
> int ret, cpu, prior_warn = 0;
>
> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
> + return 0;
> +
Does not apply; conflicts with:
commit 73fdeb66592ee80dffb16fb8a9b7378a00c1a826
Author: Huaitong Han <[email protected]>
Date: Mon Aug 31 16:21:02 2015 +0800
perf/x86/intel/pt: Fix KVM warning due to doing rdmsr() before the CPUID
test
If KVM does not support INTEL_PT, guest MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL reading will
produce host warning like "kvm [2469]: vcpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x570".
Guest can determine whether the CPU supports Intel_PT according to CPUID,
so test_cpu_cap function is added before rdmsr,and it is more in line with
the code style.
Signed-off-by: Huaitong Han <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vince Weaver <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
index 42169283448b..868e1194337f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c
@@ -139,9 +139,6 @@ static int __init pt_pmu_hw_init(void)
long i;
attrs = NULL;
- ret = -ENODEV;
- if (!test_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT))
- goto fail;
for (i = 0; i < PT_CPUID_LEAVES; i++) {
cpuid_count(20, i,
@@ -1130,6 +1127,10 @@ static __init int pt_init(void)
int ret, cpu, prior_warn = 0;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct topa) > PAGE_SIZE);
+
+ if (!test_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
u64 ctl;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
