On Fri 2015-11-13 22:53:55, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:58:12PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2015-10-13 12:53:55, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:11:38PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > > > No, you definitely shouldn't be doing this - the regulator names
> > > > > should
> > > > > reflect the names the device has in the datasheet to aid people in
> > > > > going
> > > > > from software to the hardware and back again. They shouldn't be
> > > > > dynamically generated at runtime. If you need to namespace by
> > > > device
>
> > Ok. But I'd still like to get it working.
>
> So as I've been saying use the existing interfaces, or extend them as
> needed.
Obviously I'll need to use the existing interfaces, or extend them as
needed. I'd expect subsystem maintainer to know if the existing
interfaces are ok or what needs to be fixed, but it seems you either
don't know how your subsystem works, or are not willing to tell me.
Is there someone else I should talk to with respect to regulators-ALSA
interface?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
