On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > On 19/11/2015 12:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > So yes, the alignment of the clocksource struct is not longer > > relevant. The case where we access clocksource->max_cycles is when > > CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING is enabled, which imposes worse performance > > problems to timekeeping than the extra cacheline. > > > > So the simple solution for this issue is indeed the one liner below. > > It would make sense to also remove the comment emphasizing the > alignment requirement.
Indeed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/