Le 19/11/2015 16:22, Arnd Bergmann a écrit : > On Tuesday 17 November 2015 12:35:58 Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin, >> >> This is the first "fixes" pull-request for AT91. I tried to collect little >> patches that didn't make it for -rc1. >> It can be due to synchronization between trees like the addition of some >> sama5d2 Xplained nodes (MFD tree) or the change of the watchdog compatible >> string for sama5d4 (watchdog tree). >> It can also be due to trivial cleanups that were spotted or submitted late >> like >> the replacement of "wakeup" properties or removal of unneeded defconfig >> option. >> The removal of some dead legacy DT properties or nodes is, in my opinion >> worth >> it as well in order to prevent us from abusive cut'n paste. >> NAND and ISI Atmel MAINTAINERS entries are also updated. >> >> Tell me if it's okay for you. > > I'd be happier to get the patches late in the process and then push back > myself than to get them as fixes, there was really no reason to wait > for the merge window to end with the ones that you already had.
I thought than having a precise milestone as a base for this pull-request would be preferred. > None of the changes look too invasive for -rc2, so I'm taking it anyway, > but please try to let us know what you have earlier next time, so we > can get the first fixes into the merge window, or add them as late > additions on the branches before sending the main pull requests. > > Inter-tree dependencies should never be a reason to send stuff after > -rc1, let's talk about that before the merge window if you know you > have those. Sure, the communication in advance with you would have make all this easier, sorry for not having done this. Thanks Arnd. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/