On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:24:07PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > I would consider it an > emergency-only mechanism (as in emergency brake) that isn't really > suitable for normal thermal management. In which case: Does this sort of > mechanism belong in the scheduler code?
I would prefer it not to be, but Thomas is very much opposed to teaching the nohz code to 'work' on !idle threads. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
