On 12/9/06, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no.  those two submissions represent two logically different "fixes"
and i have no intention of combining them.

Like I said, fixing the order of kcalloc parameters with a follow-up
patch to use kzalloc is just plain stupid. You can ignore my review
comments all you want, but don't expect that bit to be merged. So, for
the record: NAK for that bit of the patch, it should be converted to
kzalloc instead. Thanks.

                             Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to