On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:21:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:38:50 AM Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > In ACPI this device is only defined in SBSA mode so
> > if we are probing from ACPI use this mode.
> > 
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net>
> > Cc: Len Brown <l...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.greg...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c 
> > b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > index fd27e98..55209aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> > @@ -2368,18 +2368,28 @@ static int pl011_probe(struct amba_device *dev, 
> > const struct amba_id *id)
> >     if (!uap)
> >             return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > -   uap->clk = devm_clk_get(&dev->dev, NULL);
> > -   if (IS_ERR(uap->clk))
> > -           return PTR_ERR(uap->clk);
> > -
> > -   uap->vendor = vendor;
> > -   uap->lcrh_rx = vendor->lcrh_rx;
> > -   uap->lcrh_tx = vendor->lcrh_tx;
> > -   uap->fifosize = vendor->get_fifosize(dev);
> > +   /* ACPI only defines SBSA variant */
> > +   if (!ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev)) {
> 
> It would read more straightforward if you did
> 
>       if (ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev)) {
>               <handle the ACPI case>
>       } else {
>               <handle the non-ACPI case>
>       }
> 

This was something I debated about whether to put the ACPI case or the
common case first. I can certainly reverse it.

> > +           uap->clk = devm_clk_get(&dev->dev, NULL);
> > +           if (IS_ERR(uap->clk))
> > +                   return PTR_ERR(uap->clk);
> > +
> > +           uap->vendor = vendor;
> > +           uap->lcrh_rx = vendor->lcrh_rx;
> > +           uap->lcrh_tx = vendor->lcrh_tx;
> > +           uap->fifosize = vendor->get_fifosize(dev);
> > +           uap->port.ops = &amba_pl011_pops;
> > +           snprintf(uap->type, sizeof(uap->type), "PL011 rev%u",
> > +                           amba_rev(dev));
> > +    } else {
> > +           uap->vendor     = &vendor_sbsa;
> > +           uap->fifosize   = 32;
> > +           uap->port.ops   = &sbsa_uart_pops;
> > +           uap->fixed_baud = 115200;
> > +
> > +           snprintf(uap->type, sizeof(uap->type), "SBSA");
> 
> This looks sort of heavy-handed.
> 
> Is this the only possible configuration of the device in the ACPI case?
> 

As far as I can tell yes, but ARM haven't actually published a document
to state that as fact.

This does replace the platform_probe that Russel was unhappy about for
the ACPI case.

Graeme

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to