On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> wrote:
> The single pinmux controller can be cascaded to the other interrupt > controllers. Hence when propagating wake-up settings to its parent > interrupt controller, there's possiblity of detecting possible recursive > locking and getting lockdep warning. > > This patch avoids this false positive by using a separate lockdep class > for this single pinctrl interrupts. > > Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> I need Tony's ACK on this patch before applying. Is it a regression that needs to go into fixes? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
