On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:51:16PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote: > On 03/12/15 23:45, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Are you *sure* these are regulators and not power domains? These names > > look a lot like they could be power domains. > No, I'm not sure. Some of them are may actually be regulators (the "PHY" > ones) while others are almost definitely power domains (like the "FAP" > Forwarding Assist Processor). OK, so the power domains should be being represented and managed as such rather than using regulators - it's a better fit (doing things like support atomic context) and it also sidesteps this. For the things that you say are clearly regulators should we have more information about those?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
