Jaswinder Singh wrote: > Hello, > > I want to support old 2.4 modules features in 2.6 kernel modules:- > 1. no kernel source tree is required to build modules.
I don't think that is possible. There are a few "questions" that are quite fundamental when you want to build a module that can be loaded by a given kernel. About the most important fundamental "questions" i can think of ATM: - UP/SMP - Preempt yes/no - RegParm yes/no (x86)- High Memory off/4g/64G(IOW PAE yes/no) And maybe a few more "not so fundamental" points. AFAIK there is no way to build a module that would work in all of the 8/16 possible "kernel-types" you get with these 3/4 fundamental options alone. Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/