On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:49:13 -0800 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled: > use the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places) > of "alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc > code, which originated that reporting API). > > Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate > status, and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state. > We really don't want every RTC driver doing their own thing here... > > Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy http://www.towertech.it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
