> But it's rather a lot of churn for such a thing. Did you consider simply > using > put_unaligned() against the specific offending field(s)?
Hi. This was not considered. I wanted to give you some quick feedback, so I tried your suggestion in the fork path. It seemed to fix the problem as well. put_unaligned(timespec_to_ns(&ts), (__u64 *) &ev->timestamp_ns); Is what I tried. I'm on vacation tomorrow but on Thursday, if you like, I can whip up a patch that does this and test it more thoroughly. Is this the direction you prefer? What I did just now was really quick and dirty to see if it has a shot or not but it looks like put_unaligned will fix it too. -- Erik Jacobson - Linux System Software - SGI - Eagan, Minnesota - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
