As we have a struct device available it is better to use dev_warn()
instead of printk.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <su...@vectorindia.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
index 9d45a63..393eb2b 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
@@ -249,9 +249,8 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p)
*/
status = spi_bitbang_start(&pp->bitbang);
if (status < 0) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING
- "%s: spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n",
- DRVNAME, status);
+ dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n",
+ status);
goto out_off_and_release;
}
@@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p)
dev_dbg(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev, "spidev_lm70 at %s\n",
dev_name(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev));
else {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: spi_new_device failed\n", DRVNAME);
+ dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_new_device failed\n");
status = -ENODEV;
goto out_bitbang_stop;
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
