From: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>

No need to mimic the behaviour of perf_evlist__enable, we can use it
directly.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
index 813c52ad9303..8ca40deaa728 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
@@ -253,12 +253,9 @@ static void process_interval(void)
 
 static void handle_initial_delay(void)
 {
-       struct perf_evsel *counter;
-
        if (initial_delay) {
                usleep(initial_delay * 1000);
-               evlist__for_each(evsel_list, counter)
-                       perf_evsel__enable(counter);
+               perf_evlist__enable(evsel_list);
        }
 }
 
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to