On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour uptime > after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not gathered data, > but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit above 50% when there > is a problem so this feels good (I used 5 clean reboots when I bisected > and that worked). > > Reported-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]> > > (and please don't forget to cc stable)
I've decided to do a more in-depth fix, so that we also solve the issue that when we schedule in these down_read()s, we don't leak the permissive domain register setting into the switched-to context. Can you test this patch please? Thanks. 8<==== Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix uaccess_with_memcpy() with SW_DOMAIN_PAN The uaccess_with_memcpy() code is currently incompatible with the SW PAN code: it takes locks within the region that we've changed the DACR, potentially sleeping as a result. As we do not save and restore the DACR across co-operative sleep events, can lead to an incorrect DACR value later in this code path. Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 4 ++++ arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h index 8cc85a4ebec2..35c9db857ebe 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -510,10 +510,14 @@ __copy_to_user_std(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n); static inline unsigned long __must_check __copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) { +#ifndef CONFIG_UACCESS_WITH_MEMCPY unsigned int __ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); n = arm_copy_to_user(to, from, n); uaccess_restore(__ua_flags); return n; +#else + return arm_copy_to_user(to, from, n); +#endif } extern unsigned long __must_check diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c index d72b90905132..588bbc288396 100644 --- a/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c +++ b/arch/arm/lib/uaccess_with_memcpy.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ pin_page_for_write(const void __user *_addr, pte_t **ptep, spinlock_t **ptlp) static unsigned long noinline __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) { + unsigned long ua_flags; int atomic; if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) { @@ -118,7 +119,9 @@ __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) if (tocopy > n) tocopy = n; + ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); memcpy((void *)to, from, tocopy); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); to += tocopy; from += tocopy; n -= tocopy; @@ -145,14 +148,21 @@ arm_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) * With frame pointer disabled, tail call optimization kicks in * as well making this test almost invisible. */ - if (n < 64) - return __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n); - return __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n); + if (n < 64) { + unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); + n = __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); + } else { + n = __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n); + } + return n; } static unsigned long noinline __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) { + unsigned long ua_flags; + if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) { memset((void *)addr, 0, n); return 0; @@ -175,7 +185,9 @@ __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) if (tocopy > n) tocopy = n; + ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); memset((void *)addr, 0, tocopy); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); addr += tocopy; n -= tocopy; @@ -193,9 +205,14 @@ __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) unsigned long arm_clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long n) { /* See rational for this in __copy_to_user() above. */ - if (n < 64) - return __clear_user_std(addr, n); - return __clear_user_memset(addr, n); + if (n < 64) { + unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable(); + n = __clear_user_std(addr, n); + uaccess_restore(ua_flags); + } else { + n = __clear_user_memset(addr, n); + } + return n; } #if 0 -- 2.1.0 -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
