On 12/13/06, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the numa case is already handled; the needed info for that is exposed already
> enough... at least for irqbalance
What is the problem you are trying to solve?
If it is just interrupts irqbalanced can't help with we can do that
with a single bit.
My basic problem with understanding what this patch is trying to
solve is that I've seen some theoretical cases raised but I don't see
the real world problem.
Good question.
irqbalance could use set_affinity from boot cpu to final cpu.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
