On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:39:35PM +0800, pi3orama wrote: > > static u64 (*bpf_ktime_get_ns)(void) = > > (void *)5; > > static int (*bpf_trace_printk)(const char *fmt, int fmt_size, ...) = > > (void *)6; > > static int (*bpf_get_smp_processor_id)(void) = > > (void *)8; > > static int (*bpf_perf_event_output)(void *, struct bpf_map_def *, int, > > void *, unsigned long) = > > (void *)23; > > > > Where can I get this magical mistery table? Could this be hidden away in > > some .h file automagically included in bpf scriptlets so that n00bies > > like me don't have to be wtf'ing? > > > > They are function numbers defined in bpf.h and bpf-common.h, but they are > Linux > headers. Directly include them causes many error for llvm. Also, the function > prototypes are BPF specific and can't included in Linux source. We should have > a place holds those indices and prototypes together.
wait, what kind of errors? they are in uapi, so gets installed into /usr/include eventually and I haven't seen any erros either with gcc or clang. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
