Hi folks,
I tried to enable latencytop for arm64 and came across this discussion,
so any plan about when this will get merged into mainline? 4.5 merge window?
Thanks,
Yang
On 11/10/2015 3:34 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
From: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:10:04 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Kconfig: remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
As illustrated by a3afe70b83fd ("[S390] latencytop s390 support."),
HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT is defined by an architecture to advertise an
implementation of save_stack_trace_tsk.
However, as of 9212ddb5eada ("stacktrace: provide save_stack_trace_tsk()
weak alias") a dummy implementation is provided if STACKTRACE=y.
Given that LATENCYTOP already depends on STACKTRACE_SUPPORT and selects
STACKTRACE, we can remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT altogether.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
---
arch/arc/Kconfig | 3 ---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 -----
arch/metag/Kconfig | 3 ---
arch/microblaze/Kconfig | 3 ---
arch/parisc/Kconfig | 3 ---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 ---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 ---
arch/sh/Kconfig | 3 ---
arch/sparc/Kconfig | 4 ----
arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 3 ---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 ---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 -
12 files changed, 37 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
