Hi Stephen, Sorry. It's my mistake. In the first patch set, I tested it with "irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOREQUEST);" and in the v2 patch set the old one got in.
Regards Dhananjay -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:08 AM To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree Hi Linus, After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe': drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_irq_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID); ^ drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:23: error: 'IRQF_VALID' undeclared (first use in this function) set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID); ^ Caused by commit 8bfcbbbcabe0 ("pinctrl: nsp: add gpio-a driver support for Broadcom NSP SoC") set_irq_flags was removed before v4.3-rc2 ... I have used the gpio tree from next-20151215 for today. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
