On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Hi,
On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
In patchset:
Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to support
samples,
Patch 8/10 adds utils.[ch], which creates similar API like old
bpf_load.c and libbpf.c.
Patch 9/10 replace all sampels to use API provides by utils.[ch] and
libbpf.
Patch 10/10 removes unneeded files.
Which tree did you use for your patches? I tried to apply them against
mainline and net-next which didn't really work out.
These patches based on Arnaldo's 'perf/core' because of those libbpf
changes.
Which tree is the right one for this? net-next?
Thank you.
cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
