On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:55:11 -0800 Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Michal Hocko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ups. You are right. I will go with msleep_interruptible(100). > > I don't think that's right. > > If a signal happens, that loop is now (again) just busy-looping. It's called only by a kernel thread so no signal_pending(). This relationship is a bit unobvious and fragile, but we do it in quite a few places. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
