From: Caesar Wang <[email protected]> The dsb() instruction is pointless in this code.
Remove it. That also fixes the ARM64 compilation issue. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> Tested-by: Caesar Wang <[email protected]> --- drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c index b14716b6..8c77a52 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c @@ -49,14 +49,12 @@ static inline void __iomem *rk_base(struct clock_event_device *ce) static inline void rk_timer_disable(struct clock_event_device *ce) { writel_relaxed(TIMER_DISABLE, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG); - dsb(); } static inline void rk_timer_enable(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 flags) { writel_relaxed(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_INT_UNMASK | flags, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG); - dsb(); } static void rk_timer_update_counter(unsigned long cycles, @@ -64,13 +62,11 @@ static void rk_timer_update_counter(unsigned long cycles, { writel_relaxed(cycles, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_LOAD_COUNT0); writel_relaxed(0, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_LOAD_COUNT1); - dsb(); } static void rk_timer_interrupt_clear(struct clock_event_device *ce) { writel_relaxed(1, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_INT_STATUS); - dsb(); } static inline int rk_timer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles, -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
