Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> writes:
> Sergei Ianovich <ynv...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring
>> the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result,
>> it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs.
>>
>> Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of
>> 8250_core driver.
>>
>> Workaround for Erratum #19 according to Marvel(R) PXA270M Processor
>> Specification Update (April 19, 2010) is dropped. 8250_core reads
>> from FIFO immediately after checking DR bit in LSR.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Ianovich <ynv...@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org>
>> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr>
Shrunk the list, the following is rather mach-pxa specific.
Actually there is a small glitch ...
Have a look at arch/arm/mach-pxa/viper.c, line 490:
#ifndef CONFIG_SERIAL_PXA
...
But that can be handled in an subsequent patch to keep your acks and reviews.
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
