On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 08:07:39PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Documentation of the pi_state refcounting in the requeue code is non > existent. Add it. >
OK, one nitpic on this one I guess - 80 characters is pretty narrow as it is in my humble opinion, could we expand the newly added comment blocks to use all of the 80 character limit? > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > --- > kernel/futex.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > --- a/kernel/futex.c > +++ b/kernel/futex.c ... > - /* We got the lock. */ > + /* > + * We got the lock. We do neither drop > + * the refcount on pi_state nor clear > + * this->pi_state because the waiter > + * needs the pi_state for cleaning up > + * the user space value. It will drop > + * the refcount after doing so. > + */ > requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2); > drop_count++; > continue; > } else if (ret) { > - /* -EDEADLK */ > + /* > + * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() > + * detected a potential deadlock when > + * we tried to queue that waiter. Drop > + * the pi_state reference which we > + * took above and remove the pointer > + * to the state from the waiters > + * futex_q object. > + */ Especially the two paragraphs above ^ -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/