On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:08:57AM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> As for checkpatch, I noticed that commit 9c0ece069b3 removed "feature
> -removal.txt" file, and checkpatch removed this check in commit
> 78e3f1f01d2. checkpatch does not have such check since then. So, I am
> inclined not to add this check back to checkpatch.
I didn't mean that.
Rather, something along the lines of, for example,
the DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE matching but match those
resource matching functions using the strings, i.e.,
"(walk_iomem_res|find_next_iomem_res|region_intersects)" or so and
warn when new code uses them and that it should rather use the new
desc-matching variants.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
