On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:40:25AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > Remove from the documentation the notion of using "depends" rather > > than "depends on" in Kconfig files. > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --- > > > > given that there are only three Kconfig files left that still use > > "depends" rather than "depends on", there's no point encouraging > > anyone to still use it (although the parser itself still accepts both > > "depends" and "requires"). > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt > > b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt > > index 536d5bf..658abb5 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt > > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ applicable everywhere (see syntax). > > Optionally, dependencies only for this default value can be added with > > "if". > > > > -- dependencies: "depends on"/"requires" <expr> > > +- dependencies: "depends on" <expr> > > This defines a dependency for this menu entry. If multiple > > dependencies are defined, they are connected with '&&'. Dependencies > > are applied to all other options within this menu entry (which also > > Your patch does something different: > It's not about "depends", it's about the unused alternative "requires". > > Removing "requires" sounds reasonable (even for the implementation, not > only the documentation), but that's different from what you were > thinking about.
argh, sorry, brain glitch there. i'll resubmit with the right wording. rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
