On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 00:34 +0000, David Howells wrote: > David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Partially revert commit 41c89b64d7184a780f12f2cccdabe65cb2408893: > > > > Author: Petko Manolov <pet...@mip-labs.com> > > Date: Wed Dec 2 17:47:55 2015 +0200 > > IMA: create machine owner and blacklist keyrings > > > > The problem is that prep->trusted is a simple boolean and the additional > > x509_validate_trust() call doesn't therefore distinguish levels of > > trustedness, but is just OR'd with the result of validation against the > > system trusted keyring. > > > > However, setting the trusted flag means that this key may be added to *any* > > trusted-only keyring - including the system trusted keyring.
Hm, I'm not able to add a key to the system keyring that is signed by a key on either the system or the IMA MOK keyrings. The system keyring seems to be "locked". A key that is signed by either a key on the system or the IMA MOK keyring can be added to the IMA keyring. keyctl show %keyring:.system_keyring Keyring 973688077 ---lswrv 0 0 keyring: .system_keyring evmctl import m1-cert-signed.der 973688077 add_key failed errno: Permission denied (13) Mimi > > Whilst I appreciate what the patch is trying to do, I don't think this is > > quite the right solution. > Please apply this to security/next. > > Thanks, > David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/