On 20/01/16 16:10, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> writes:
>
>>> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &ctl))
>>> + panic("%s: failed to get reg base", node->name);
>>> +
>>> + chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + chip->ctl = ctl;
>>> + chip->base = base;
>
> As I said before, this assumes the outer DT node uses a ranges
> property. Normally reg properties work the same whether they specify an
> offset within an outer "ranges" or have a full address directly. It
> would be easy enough to make this work with either, so I don't see any
> reason not to.
Yup, that is a good point. I guess Marc can address this in the next
round, since we need a DT binding anyway.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
