On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 01:03:02AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

> +                                          min_callchain_hits,
> +                                          &callchain_param);
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  static void __hists__insert_output_entry(struct rb_root *entries,
>                                        struct hist_entry *he,
>                                        u64 min_callchain_hits,
> @@ -1288,6 +1356,17 @@ void hists__output_resort(struct hists *hists, struct 
> ui_progress *prog)
>  
>       min_callchain_hits = hists->stats.total_period * 
> (callchain_param.min_percent / 100);
>  
> +     hists__reset_stats(hists);
> +     hists__reset_col_len(hists);
> +
> +     if (symbol_conf.report_hierarchy) {
> +             return hists__hierarchy_output_resort(hists, prog,
> +                                                   &hists->entries_collapsed,

is the 'in-root' always hists->entries_collapsed in here?

should you use the 'root' var from the condition below?

thanks,
jirka

> +                                                   &hists->entries,
> +                                                   min_callchain_hits,
> +                                                   use_callchain);
> +     }
> +
>       if (sort__need_collapse)
>               root = &hists->entries_collapsed;
>       else
> @@ -1296,9 +1375,6 @@ void hists__output_resort(struct hists *hists, struct 
> ui_progress *prog)
>       next = rb_first(root);
>       hists->entries = RB_ROOT;
>  
> -     hists__reset_stats(hists);
> -     hists__reset_col_len(hists);
> -
>       while (next) {
>               n = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry, rb_node_in);
>               next = rb_next(&n->rb_node_in);
> -- 
> 2.6.4
> 

Reply via email to