On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 06:03:57PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c 
> b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
[...]
> +static void soctherm_debug_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct tegra_soctherm *tegra = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +     struct dentry *root, *file;
> +
> +     root = debugfs_create_dir("tegra_soctherm", NULL);

Perhaps leave away the tegra_ prefix here? It's kind of redundant.

> +     if (!root) {
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create debugfs directory\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     tegra->debugfs_dir = root;
> +
> +     file = debugfs_create_file("regs", 0644, root, pdev, &regs_fops);

Can we call this something different, please? "summary" would be a
better name, in my opinion.

> +     if (!file)
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to create debugfs file\n");
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void soctherm_debug_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{ return 0; }

Please follow the regular CodingStyle here, too:

        ...
        {
                return 0;
        }

> @@ -178,6 +309,10 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       if (!tegra)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +     dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, tegra);
> +
> +     tegra->soc = soc;

This looks odd here. Does this perhaps belong in one of the previous
patches?

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to