On 01/21/16 13:21, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:04:57PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> I'm wondering, though, if it wouldn't be better to turn these into >> macros so that they can be used in assembly code. That way the >> definitions can be interspersed with the X86_FEATURE_ definitions, >> too. > > What concrete use case do you have in mind, i.e., example? >
See X86_CAPABILITY in head_32.S for example.
-hpa
