On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> > > So here's the first version of what we talked about. I've ran randbuilds > on it for a night because of patch 1 with all the header reorg and we > all know how that can be painful. So this version passes all randbuild > configs I had generated. > > In talking about patch 1, it is a bit big but if you look at the > diffstat, it basically is fixing a bunch of includes and the meat of it > being the carving out of the X86_FEATURE_* things to a separate file. > > Rest of the patches should be pretty self-explanatory, check the > respective commit messages. > > I haven't tested it functionally yet (booting in kvm doesn't really > count) - thus the RFC tag. I thought I should send it out first so that > people can doublecheck me on the direction this is going. > > Thanks! > > Borislav Petkov (4): > x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEATURE_* > x86/cpufeature: Remove static_cpu_has() > x86/cpufeature: Get rid of the non-asm goto variant > x86/alternatives: Add an auxilary section > > Brian Gerst (1): > x86/alternatives: Discard dynamic check after init
Tested it and it works. Looks good to me. Only thing was it didn't apply to tip/master due to a new cpuid flag added. -- Brian Gerst
