On 01/21/16 14:56, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > so this is silly: we're basically jumping after the JMP instruction > itself. So that will be the case on !X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS CPUs. > Still a two-byte and now even a useless JMP. > > The right thing to do would be to generate a NOP simply. >
OK, so gcc isn't as clever as I thought.
-hpa
