On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:

> > -                       little-endian;
> > +                       native-endian;

> But native-endian == big-endian usually for bcm63xx, so is this
> actually a bugfix?

Yes, it's buggy - in v4.5-rc1 we respect the endianness so big endian
just won't work, prior to that this was a hack around another bug which
was done rather than reporting it so it "just" results in a DT that's
obviously incorrect.  This local hack has been causing a lot of
problems.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to